From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartsuff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 2, 2021
No. 4018-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

4018-20S

06-02-2021

Erica A. Hartsuff Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On October 7, 2020, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that no valid notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been issued to petitioner with respect to taxable year 2017. In the motion to dismiss, respondent explained that notice of deficiency had not been properly sent to petitioner's statutory last known address within the meaning of the governing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Although the Court afforded petitioner the opportunity to file an objection, if any, to the motion, petitioner has not done so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the purported notice of deficiency is invalid.


Summaries of

Hartsuff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 2, 2021
No. 4018-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Hartsuff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Erica A. Hartsuff Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

No. 4018-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 2, 2021)