From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartsfield v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 20, 2015
177 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. 2015)

Opinion

No. SC15–677.

08-20-2015

Steven HARTSFIELD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hartsfield v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug 20, 2015
177 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. 2015)
Case details for

Hartsfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven HARTSFIELD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

177 So. 3d 1266 (Fla. 2015)
2015 WL 4944290