From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartsfield v. Dir. TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv58 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv58

10-26-2011

JOHN HARTSFIELD v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Petitioner John Hartsfield, proceeding pro se, filed this application for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254 complaining of the legality of his conviction. This Court ordered that the matter be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge ordered the Respondent to answer the petition, and Hartsfield filed a response to the answer. After review of the pleadings and the state court records, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the petition be dismissed. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that a certificate of appealability be denied sua sponte.

Hartsfield received a copy of the Magistrate Judge's Report on September 14, 2011, but has filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has concluded that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled application for the writ of habeas corpus be and hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that the Petitioner John Hartsfield is hereby DENIED a certificate of appealability sua sponte. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hartsfield v. Dir. TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv58 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Hartsfield v. Dir. TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARTSFIELD v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11cv58 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2011)