From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartsell v. Rawe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78503 ED 78541

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Charles A. Hurth, III, Union, MO, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jagadeesh B. Mandava, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for Appellants.

Dennis Herbert Tesreau, Bianca L. Eden, Wegmann, Gasaway, Stewart, Dieffenbach, Tesreau, Sherman, Missey P.C., Hillsboro, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Appellants, Dan and Melody Rawe and the Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's final award modifying and affirming the decision of the administrative law judge allowing compensation to respondent Dennis Hartsell. We Affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hartsell v. Rawe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Hartsell v. Rawe

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS HARTSELL, Claimant/Respondent, v. DAN RAWE AND MELODY L. RAWE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)