From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartnett v. Zuchowski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

858 CA 18–01733

09-27-2019

Joseph HARTNETT and Marika Hartnett, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Michael ZUCHOWSKI, Defendant–Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Appeal No. 2.)

JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI, LLC, BUFFALO (JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS. OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY P. DIPALMA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.


JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI, LLC, BUFFALO (JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS.

OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY P. DIPALMA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Hartnett v. Zuchowski ( [appeal No. 1] 175 A.D.3d 1831, 107 N.Y.S.3d 751 [Sept. 27, 2019] [4th Dept. 2019] ).


Summaries of

Hartnett v. Zuchowski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 27, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Hartnett v. Zuchowski

Case Details

Full title:Joseph HARTNETT and Marika Hartnett, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Michael…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 27, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
107 N.Y.S.3d 753