From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartnett v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 9, 1950
71 A.2d 303 (Md. 1950)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 28, October Term, 1949.]

Decided February 9, 1950.

The question of guilt or innocence and weight of the evidence cannot be tried on habeas corpus. pp. 727-728

A preliminary hearing is not necessary before a valid indictment can be obtained. p. 728

The questions of irregularities in procedure cannot be retried on habeas corpus. p. 728

Decided February 9, 1950.

Habeas corpus proceeding by John Lawrence Hartnett against Warden of Maryland House of Correction. On application for leave to appeal from refusal of the writ.

Application denied.

Before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.


This is an application for leave to appeal from an order remanding petitioner, after hearing on a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is confined in the Maryland House of Correction for the period of four years for the offenses of perjury and bigamy. Petitioner alleges that he was convicted of perjury as a result of obtaining a marriage license. He claims that he was not under oath when he applied for the marriage license. He claims he did not have a preliminary trial. He further claims that before he was tried he was told that the perjury and bigamy charge were the same.

The question of guilt or innocence and weight of the evidence cannot be tried on habeas corpus. Rountree v. Wright, 189 Md. 292, 55 A.2d 847. A preliminary hearing is not necessary before a valid indictment can be obtained. State ex rel. Sanner v. Warden, 191 Md. 743, 59 A.2d 762. The questions of irregularities in procedure cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 44 A.2d 807.

Application denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Hartnett v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 9, 1950
71 A.2d 303 (Md. 1950)
Case details for

Hartnett v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:HARTNETT v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Feb 9, 1950

Citations

71 A.2d 303 (Md. 1950)
71 A.2d 303

Citing Cases

Ferrell v. Warden

We have repeatedly held in habeas corpus cases that a preliminary hearing is not necessary before a valid…

Cave v. Superintendent

He says this is so under a Federal law, and cites a section of Corpus Juris Secundum as authority for his…