Hartnett v. Placer County Superior Court

Full title: STACEY HARTNETT, Plaintiff, v. PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

2:13-cv-1636-GEB-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

STACEY HARTNETT, Plaintiff, v. PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-1636-GEB-KJN PS. United States District Court, E.D. California. September 27, 2013.

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         On August 12, 2013, the court denied plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice.¹ (ECF No. 3.) The court ordered plaintiff to either pay the applicable filing fee or file an amended application demonstrating her entitlement to proceed in forma pauperis if she could do so in good faith. (Id.)

1 This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

         On September 11, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the denial of in forma pauperis status. (ECF No. 4.) However, on September 26, 2013, plaintiff elected to pay the filing fee.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.