In Hartmann v. Hearst (121 App. Div. 925) the Special Term also vacated an order for the examination of a party before trial; and the order in that case was also affirmed by this court without opinion.
Summary of this case from Wallace v. BaconOctober, 1907.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
In Hartmann v. Hearst (121 App. Div. 925) the Special Term also vacated an order for the examination of a party before trial; and the order in that case was also affirmed by this court without opinion.
Summary of this case from Wallace v. BaconFull title:Carl F. Hartmann, Respondent, v. William Randolph Hearst, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1907
The motion to vacate the order was made upon an affidavit from which it appeared that the party sought to be…