In Gottlieb v. Hartman, 3 Colo. 53, 22 P.St.Rep. 53, the defendant had pawned the property in question and put it out of his control.
Summary of this case from Evans v. Carrolls&sCo.December, 1922.
Present — Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, pursuant to section 106 of the Civil Practice Act, with costs. No opinion.
In Gottlieb v. Hartman, 3 Colo. 53, 22 P.St.Rep. 53, the defendant had pawned the property in question and put it out of his control.
Summary of this case from Evans v. Carrolls&sCo.Full title:PETER HARTMAN, an Infant, by ADAM HITTER, His Guardian ad Litem…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1922
A case is cited by the author, which we have examined and find on all fours with the one at bar, holding that…
Evans v. Carrolls&sCo.In Humbert v. Mason, 1909, 46 Colo. 430, 104 P. 1037, the defendant had cashed a draft and converted the…