From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-03448-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-03448-PA-KES

03-14-2018

CINDY HARTMAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation (Dkt. 19), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 21). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. (Dkt. 22) The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying benefits. DATED: March 14, 2018

/s/_________

HON. PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hartman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-03448-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Hartman v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:CINDY HARTMAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-03448-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2018)