From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. Tifft

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 17, 2012
87 So. 3d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 1D11–1814.

2012-04-17

Drew C. HARTLEY, Appellant, v. TIFFT, Romine, Fennimore, Mixon, Blue, and John Does, Appellees.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Thomas R. Santurri, Judge. Drew C. Hartley, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.


An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Thomas R. Santurri, Judge.
Drew C. Hartley, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.

Finding appellees' motion for remand and notice of concession of error to be well-taken, the order dismissing the complaint without prejudice is quashed and the cause is remanded with instructions to allow appellant leave to amend his complaint. If appellant fails to sufficiently allege an amount in controversy to meet the jurisdictional requirements of the circuit court, the complaint should be transferred to the county court. See Spradley v. Doe, 612 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (holding that an order dismissing a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to be error and remanding the case for transfer to the county court).

BENTON, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hartley v. Tifft

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 17, 2012
87 So. 3d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Hartley v. Tifft

Case Details

Full title:Drew C. HARTLEY, Appellant, v. TIFFT, Romine, Fennimore, Mixon, Blue, and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

87 So. 3d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Edwards v. Jones

The circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case. This jurisdictional deficiency…