From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 19, 2006
933 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2D06-1107.

July 19, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Dennis P. Maloney, J.


Terry Lee Hartley challenges the postconviction court's order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm, without comment, the postconviction court's denial of claim one and reverse the postconviction court's denial of the remaining two claims.

In claims two and three, Hartley alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are cognizable in rule 3.850 motions, and neither the postconviction court's order nor the State's response, on which it was based, attached any portions of the record conclusively refuting Hartley's claims. See Wilson v. State, 693 So.2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse the postconviction court's denial of claims two and three and remand for further proceedings. If the postconviction court again summarily denies Hartley's claims, it must attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute them. See rule 3.850(d).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hartley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 19, 2006
933 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Hartley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terry Lee HARTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 19, 2006

Citations

933 So. 2d 685 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Gatlin v. State

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again…