From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 26, 2020
CASE NO. C18-5576 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. C18-5576 BHS

02-26-2020

JOSHUA HARTLEY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak's ("Amtrak") motion for summary judgment on punitive damages. Dkt. 18.

On October 30, 2019, Amtrak filed the instant motion. Id. On November 20, 2019, Plaintiff Joshua Hartley responded. Dkt. 20. On November 22, 2019, Amtrak replied. Dkt. 23.

Upon review of the motion, the Court grants the motion on the same grounds and for the same reasons set forth in Mitchem v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., C18-5366-BHS, 2020 WL 91490 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 8, 2020) and related cases cited therein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 26th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hartley v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 26, 2020
CASE NO. C18-5576 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Hartley v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA HARTLEY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. C18-5576 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 26, 2020)