From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartford Co. v. State Bank of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 19, 1926
242 P. 826 (Or. 1926)

Opinion

Argued December 15, 1925

Affirmed January 19, 1926

From Multnomah: WALTER H. EVANS, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Bowerman Kavanaugh, with an oral argument by Mr. Jay Bowerman.

For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Griffith, Peck Coke, with an oral argument by Mr. John S. Coke.


The facts in this case and the law governing it are identical with the facts and principles announced and followed in the case of Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Bramwell, ante, p. 1 ( 242 P. 823), this day decided, except that in this case no issue was presented as to the time elapsing between the disallowance of the preference claimed by the plaintiff and the commencement of the suit. This case, therefore, is controlled by that decision, and a like result must follow in this case. The decree is therefore affirmed. AFFIRMED.

McBRIDE, C.J., and BURNETT and COSHOW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hartford Co. v. State Bank of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 19, 1926
242 P. 826 (Or. 1926)
Case details for

Hartford Co. v. State Bank of Portland

Case Details

Full title:HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY v. STATE BANK OF PORTLAND

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 19, 1926

Citations

242 P. 826 (Or. 1926)
242 P. 826