From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartfield v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1669-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 13, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1669-G (BH) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:92-CR-268-P

07-13-2016

DARRYL WAYNE HARTFIELD, ID # 23121-077, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is successive and will be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002), and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997), by separate judgment.

SO ORDERED. July 13, 2016.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hartfield v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1669-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Hartfield v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL WAYNE HARTFIELD, ID # 23121-077, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 13, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1669-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 13, 2016)