From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harter v. Donahoe

Supreme Court of California
Jan 29, 1886
2 Cal. Unrep. 633 (Cal. 1886)

Opinion

         Department 1. Appeal from superior court, county of Fresno.

         COUNSEL

          Grady & Merriam, for appellant.

          Sayle & Harris, for respondent.


          OPINION

          THE COURT.

          The evidence showed that there was no such immediate delivery and continued change of possession of the property in question as required by statute to make valid the transfer to plaintiff. Civil Code, § 3440.

          Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Harter v. Donahoe

Supreme Court of California
Jan 29, 1886
2 Cal. Unrep. 633 (Cal. 1886)
Case details for

Harter v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:HARTER v. DONAHOE.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 29, 1886

Citations

2 Cal. Unrep. 633 (Cal. 1886)
2 Cal. Unrep. 633