HART v. UBOC LOCAL NO. 626

1 Citing case

  1. Sedman v. Michigan Bell

    125 Mich. App. 761 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    Forfeiture provisions in pension plans are to be liberally interpreted in favor of the employee. Hart v United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America Local No 626, 352 A.2d 423 (Del Super, 1976); Paddock Pool Construction Co v Monseur, 23 Ariz. App. 451; 533 P.2d 1188 (1975). In fact, public policy requires that pension plans be construed, where possible, to avoid forfeiture.