Opinion
No. 05-04-01126-CR
Opinion Filed September 22, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-55540-QR. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, FRANCIS, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Robert Earl Hart entered a open guilty plea to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. The judge found appellant guilty, made an affirmative deadly weapon finding, and sentenced appellant to imprisonment for seven years. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.