From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HART v. PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1672 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1672 FCD EFB PS.

December 10, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 1, 2010, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Include the Equal Opportunity Commission Files." Dckt. No. 8. Plaintiff states that he moves "to include documents submitted to the commission during the compilation of this case" and contends that "[t]he inclusion will reveal the defendant is fully aware and has already appeared in this action." Id. at 1. Attached to plaintiff's one-page motion is a copy of the service form that plaintiff submitted to the United States Marshal. Id. at 2.

Although it is unclear what precise relief plaintiff seeks in his motion, it appears that plaintiff wants to show that defendant is aware of this action. However, on December 6, 2010, defendant filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint. Therefore, plaintiff's motion, Dckt. No. 8, is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 10, 2010.


Summaries of

HART v. PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1672 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)
Case details for

HART v. PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HENRY HART, Plaintiff, v. PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1672 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)