From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Moon

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1856
6 Cal. 161 (Cal. 1856)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Alameda County.

         Action of forcible entry. The prayer of the complaint is for restitution, and that defendants may be punished by payment of proper fine, and costs, and damages sustained by plaintiff.

         The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff, for $ 275, which was trebled by the Court.

         Defendant appealed.

         COUNSEL

          E. R. Carpentier, for Appellant.

          S. S. Chipman, H. S. Foote, A. G. Wilson, A. Williams and E. Cook, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Terry. Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         The decision of Zander v. Coe, (5 Cal. 230,) limiting the jurisdiction of justices in civil cases, does not apply to proceedings under the statute concerning forcible entry. The motion for nonsuit was properly overruled, as there was abundant evidence introduced by plaintiff to justify a verdict in his favor.

         The points that the pleadings were insufficient to justify the judgment, and that the Court erred in trebling the damages assessed by the jury, have heretofore been decided in the case of O'Callaghan v. Booth, at the October term, 1855, ante 63.

         Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Hart v. Moon

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1856
6 Cal. 161 (Cal. 1856)
Case details for

Hart v. Moon

Case Details

Full title:HART v. MOON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1856

Citations

6 Cal. 161 (Cal. 1856)

Citing Cases

Tewksbury v. O'Connell

This casehas never been reversed. The subsequent cases of O'Callaghan v. Booth , 6 Cal. 63, and Hart v. Moore…

Freeman v. Powers

         The jurisdiction of justices of the peace is limited by the Constitution to cases in which the…