Opinion
No. 13-1642
12-04-2013
David R. Simonsen, Jr., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Yvonne Steenstra Gibney, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Hanover, Virginia; William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00794-JRS) Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Simonsen, Jr., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Yvonne Steenstra Gibney, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Hanover, Virginia; William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Betty W. Hart, who was previously employed by the Hanover County School Board ("the Board"), filed a complaint against the Board and its Director of Pupil Transportation, Michael Ashby, asserting that her employment was terminated in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (West 1998 & Supp. 2013). We previously affirmed the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss Hart's complaint, but vacated the district court's order denying Hart's Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to vacate, and her Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) motion to amend her complaint. On remand, the district court denied Hart's motion to amend her complaint, and denied her Rule 59(e) motion. Hart timely appealed.
We have reviewed the record and considered the parties' arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's final order. Hart v. Hanover County Sch. Bd., No. 3:10-cv-00794-JRS (E.D. Va. May 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED