From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Fitzpatrick

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 2005
143 F. App'x 832 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Robert C. Hart, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Mark E. Wood, Esq., Clark County District Attorney's Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Robert C. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-00571-RCJ.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Robert C. Hart appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his action alleging that Clark County Treasurer, Laura B. Fitzpatrick, violated his constitutional rights by attempting to collect taxes on his real property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Jerron West, Inc. v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization, 129 F.3d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.

The district court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction over Hart's action because he already attempted, unsuccessfully, to obtain a state court judgment against appellee over the same property at issue in the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1341 ("The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State."); Patel v. City of San Bernardino, 310 F.3d 1138, 1140 (9th Cir.2002) (prohibiting declaratory and injunctive relief in federal court where taxpayer has adequate state court remedy and proscribing claims for damages).

Hart's remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hart v. Fitzpatrick

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 2005
143 F. App'x 832 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Hart v. Fitzpatrick

Case Details

Full title:Robert C. HART, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. Laura B. FITZPATRICK, Clark…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 2005

Citations

143 F. App'x 832 (9th Cir. 2005)