We believe that Goldstein stands for the proposition that a judgment of conviction is conclusive evidence of probable cause, unless the judgment was obtained by fraud, perjury or other corrupt means. Hart v. Duncan, 233 So.2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). Hence, it was only necessary that Padrevita allege the procurement of his conviction by fraud, perjury or other corrupt means to overcome the presumption created by his initial conviction.

Kilburn v. Davenport, 286 So.2d 241 (3 Fla.App. 1973); and O'Brien v. Food Fair Stores, North Dade, Inc., 155 So.2d 836 (3 Fla.App. 1963).Hart v. Duncan, 233 So.2d 133 (4 Fla.App. 1970), and Priest v. Groover, 289 So.2d 767 (3 Fla.App. 1974). I would reverse and remand.