From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Brunswick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $412.38, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. There is no proof of damages under the items for taxi hire, "cord casing," or depreciation. The court was in error in adding interest. Interest in this case was a question for the jury. ( Wilson v. City of Troy, 135 N.Y. 96; Regan v. City of New York, 175 App. Div. 861.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hart v. Brunswick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Hart v. Brunswick

Case Details

Full title:HICKSON F. HART, Respondent, v. FREDERICK W. BRUNSWICK and Another, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)