From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 3, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH), Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH), Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW.

March 3, 2010


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE


The matter before me is Defendant's Notice of Related Case and Unopposed Motion To Consolidate [#77] filed March 2, 2010. I grant the motion.

As I found in previous orders granting consolidation in this matter, the newly instituted action, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW, Malloy v. The Boeing Company, Inc. , implicates questions of law and fact common to those arising in the cases previously consolidated. ( See Order Granting Motion To Consolidate and Denying Motions To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#32] entered June 15, 2009; Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#49] entered September 28, 2009; Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#52] entered October 15, 2009.) Consolidation of this action into Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, therefore, will be appropriate and efficacious. See FED.R.CIV.P. 42(a); Breaux v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. , 220 F.R.D. 366, 367 (D. Colo. 2004).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Defendant's Notice of Related Case and Unopposed Motion To Consolidate [#77] filed March 2, 2010, is GRANTED;

2. That pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH for all purposes;

3. That pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW is REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty;

4. That all future filings in these consolidated actions shall be captioned as shown below:

Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066- REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH, and 10-cv-00400-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. and;

5. That by March 10, 2010, plaintiff in Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400 SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs' Opposition to The Boeing Company's Motion To Certify Order Denying Motion To Dismiss for Interlocutory Appeal (Dkt. No. 56) [#70] filed December 14, 2009, or, alternatively, a separate response to the motion; provided, furthermore, if plaintiff files a separate response, defendant may file a reply within the time permitted by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C.


Summaries of

Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 3, 2010
Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH), Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ROBERT P…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 3, 2010

Citations

Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH), Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 3, 2010)