From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1964
159 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 61-531.

January 22, 1964.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County; Pat Cannon, Judge.

Papy, Talburt Carruthers, Miami, for appellant.

Truett Watkins, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.


Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on October 9, 1962 ( 145 So.2d 285), affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas on review of this court's judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, 1963 ( 159 So.2d 236) and mandate dated January 20, 1964, now lodged in this court, quashed this court's judgment and the cause was remanded for the entry of a decision in conformity with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, it is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on October 25, 1962, is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed October 9, 1962 is vacated; the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the judgment of the Circuit Court appealed herein is affirmed, as directed by the opinion now adopted by this court.

Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).


Summaries of

Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 22, 1964
159 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack

Case Details

Full title:HART PROPERTIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. JOHN SLACK, A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 22, 1964

Citations

159 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. S.E. Development Corp.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse final summary judgment. We affirm the summary judgment but remand for…