From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Allergan, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-353-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-353-FtM-29CM

08-09-2018

PRECIOUS HART, LAVERNE HART, JAVONTA EDVARIS HART and THE ESTATE OF JAMES HART, individually and on behalf of the estate of James Hart, deceased Plaintiffs, v. ALLERGAN, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendant Allergan, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend the Initial Disclosures Deadline filed on August 7, 2018. Doc. 28. Defendant requests to extend the August 7, 2018 initial disclosures deadline in the Case Management and Scheduling Order ("CMSO") to September 7, 2018. Id. at 1. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.

Rule 16 requires a showing of good cause for modification of a court's scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). "The diligence of the moving party should be considered in determining whether there is good cause to extend a deadline." Jozwiak v. Stryker Corp., No. 6:09-cv-1985-Orl-19GJK, 2010 WL 743834, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 26, 2010). In other words, the moving party must demonstrate it could not meet the deadline despite its diligent efforts. Sosa v. Airprint Sys., Inc., 133 F.3d 1417, 1418 (11th Cir. 1998); Idearc Media Corp. v. Kimsey & Assocs., P.A., No. 807-CV-1024-T-17EAJ, 2009 WL 413531, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2009). District courts have broad discretion when managing their cases, including discovery and scheduling. Johnson v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Ga., 263 F.3d 1234, 1269 (11th Cir. 2001).

Here, Defendant seeks to extend the initial disclosures deadline in the CMSO (Doc. 27) to September 7, 2018. Doc. 28 at 1. Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion and Defendant notes that the parties previously agreed upon the September 7 deadline for initial disclosures. Id. Because the requested extension also will not affect any other deadlines in the CMSO, the Court finds good cause to extend the initial disclosures deadline to September 7, 2018.

ACCORDINGLY, it is

ORDERED:

1. Defendant Allergan, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend the Initial Disclosures Deadline (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. The parties shall have up to and including September 7, 2018 to serve mandatory initial disclosures.

2. All other deadlines and directives set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 27) remain in effect.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 9th day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

CAROL MIRANDO

United States Magistrate Judge Copies:
Counsel of record


Summaries of

Hart v. Allergan, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
Case No: 2:18-cv-353-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Hart v. Allergan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PRECIOUS HART, LAVERNE HART, JAVONTA EDVARIS HART and THE ESTATE OF JAMES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-353-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2018)