From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harshman v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-014828 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-014828

10-08-2020

INA JOANNE HARSHMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On September 22, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before October 6, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Johnson & Johnson, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff's case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: October 8, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Harshman v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-014828 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Harshman v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:INA JOANNE HARSHMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 8, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-014828 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2020)