From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harsh v. Barone

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-223 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-223 Erie

December 07, 2011.


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 7, 2010 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 45], filed on November 18, 2011, recommended that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Barone, Bunting, Riskus and Setnik [ECF No. 38] be granted insofar as Defendant Barone should be dismissed from this action, and denied in all other regards. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections. Plaintiff filed objections [ECF No. 46] on December 1, 2011. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Barone, Bunting, Riskus and Setnik [ECF No. 38] is GRANTED with respect to Defendant Barone and he is hereby DISMISSED from this action; the motion is DENIED in all other regards.

The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 45] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on November 18, 2011, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Harsh v. Barone

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-223 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Harsh v. Barone

Case Details

Full title:HARSH v. BARONE

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-223 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2011)