From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harry R. Defler Corporation v. Kleeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

July 1, 1963

Appeal from the Erie Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Reargument directed in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: We find sufficient evidence to establish a conspiracy involving all of the defendants substantially as alleged in the complaint and we also find that the acts of the defendants resulted in damage to the plaintiff for which the plaintiff is entitled to recover. However, we desire reargument on the question only of the extent of the recovery and the scope of an injunction, if any. We direct that the case be reargued at the September Term of this court and that the parties submit briefs not later than August 14, 1963, covering the possible scope of an injunction as to time and extent and the precise period or periods to be covered and included in the accounting by the defendants.


Summaries of

Harry R. Defler Corporation v. Kleeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Harry R. Defler Corporation v. Kleeman

Case Details

Full title:HARRY R. DEFLER CORPORATION, Appellant-Respondent, v. FRANCIS S. KLEEMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)