From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided May 14th, 1928.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. D. Trueman Stackhouse, for the appellant.

Mr. Albert S. Woodruff, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming, and reported in 101 N.J. Eq. 45. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — PARKER, MINTURN, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike

Case Details

Full title:HARRY PINSKY SON COMPANY, appellant, v. EDGAR L. WIKE, treasurer, c., et…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1928

Citations

141 A. 920 (N.J. 1928)
141 A. 920

Citing Cases

Solondz Bros. Lumber Co. v. Piperato

The language of section 77 is not a mandate to set forth the amount due with absolute accuracy. But as much…

Chesebro-Whitman Co. v. Edenboro Apartments, Inc.

Another exception to the "actual incorporation" test is the rule that transportation charges are lienable.…