From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harry Hastings Attractions v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1922
203 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

October, 1922.

Present — Blackmar, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ.


Motion to suspend operation of the injunction order pending appeal denied and stay vacated, on condition that within five days plaintiff file an additional surety company undertaking in the sum of $4,000 to indemnify defendant against any loss; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Harry Hastings Attractions v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1922
203 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

Harry Hastings Attractions v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:HARRY HASTINGS ATTRACTIONS, Respondent, v. TOM HOWARD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1922

Citations

203 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)