From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harry David v. Pathak

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 30, 2010
Civ. No. 09-3013-CL (D. Or. Nov. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 09-3013-CL.

November 30, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#68) is adopted. Defendant is reminded that he is ordered to file with the court and serve on plaintiff a written, sworn statement describing in detail the manner and form in which he is complying with the order of the court, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 30 day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Harry David v. Pathak

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 30, 2010
Civ. No. 09-3013-CL (D. Or. Nov. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Harry David v. Pathak

Case Details

Full title:HARRY AND DAVID, an Oregon Corporation Plaintiff, v. ANSHU PATHAK, an…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 09-3013-CL (D. Or. Nov. 30, 2010)