From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harron v. Cartwright

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1538.

March 7, 2006


MEMORANDUM/ORDER


On October 4, 2005, defendants filed "Defendants J. Robert Cartwright and Upper Mount Bethel Township's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings" (Docket # 5). On October 26, 2005, defendants filed "Defendants' Motion to Grant as Uncontested Defendants J. Robert Cartwright and Upper Mount Bethel Township's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings" (Docket # 6). Each of these motions was accompanied by a certificate of service indicating that each motion had been served on plaintiff's counsel of record. Plaintiff has not responded to either motion. The motion for judgment on the pleadings will therefore be granted as unopposed pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c).

It is hereby ORDERED that "Defendants J. Robert Cartwright and Upper Mount Bethel Township's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings" (Docket # 5) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED to the extent it asserts causes of action arising from defendants' refusal to grant plaintiff a building permit. It is further ORDERED that "Defendants' Motion to Grant as Uncontested Defendants J. Robert Cartwright and Upper Mount Bethel Township's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings" (Docket # 6) is DISMISSED as moot.


Summaries of

Harron v. Cartwright

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Harron v. Cartwright

Case Details

Full title:J. BRAD HARRON, Plaintiff, v. J. ROBERT CARTWRIGHT and UPPER MOUNT BETHEL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

Schutter v. Herskowitz

Other caselaw in this district supports the application of the plain language of Local Civil Rule 7.1 and the…

QBE Ins. Corp. v. Azar

There is some unpublished federal authority suggesting that if a party fails to respond to a motion for entry…