From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 21, 1993
867 S.W.2d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63769.

December 21, 1993.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; JIMMIE M. EDWARDS, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose. Therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

Harrold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 21, 1993
867 S.W.2d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Harrold v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY HARROLD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Dec 21, 1993

Citations

867 S.W.2d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)