From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrod v. Allied Universal Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 28, 1994
644 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1420.

October 28, 1994.

Appeal from the Judge of Compensation Claims, Judith Nelson, J.

George F. Taylor, Jr. of Law Offices of George F. Taylor, Jr., P.A., Miami, for appellant.

H. George Kagan and Helene H. Morris of Miller, Kagan and Chait, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


The claimant appeals a workers' compensation order in which the judge failed to address a pending claim for an attorney's fee in connection with permanent total disability benefits. The employer's acceptance of the permanent total claim prior to the conclusion of the proceeding below does not necessarily preclude an attorney's fee, see Groves v. Butler, 525 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), and the judge should have addressed the issue in this regard. Furthermore, the judge's denial of the claim for attendant care in this case will not necessarily preclude a future claim, see Caron v. Systematic Air Services, 576 So.2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and should not have been made "with prejudice." Accordingly, we reverse the appealed order insofar as the denial of the attendant care claim was made "with prejudice," and as to the failure to address the claim for an attorney's fee in connection with permanent total disability benefits. The appealed order is otherwise affirmed, and the case is remanded.

WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrod v. Allied Universal Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 28, 1994
644 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Harrod v. Allied Universal Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HARROD, APPELLANT, v. ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP. AND EMPLOYERS-SELF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 28, 1994

Citations

644 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)