From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2016
2:14-cv-1806-LSC (N.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2016)

Opinion

2:14-cv-1806-LSC

09-01-2016

JEFF HARRISON , Plaintiff, v. U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

On April 19, 2016, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation, recommending that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. 25.) The defendant filed objections on May 3, 2016. (Doc. 26.) The action was then reassigned to the undersigned. The plaintiff responded to the objections on May 12, 2016. (Doc. 28.)

Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the objections thereto, and the response to those objections, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. 12) is hereby DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2016.

/s/_________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

160704


Summaries of

Harrison v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2016
2:14-cv-1806-LSC (N.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Harrison v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.

Case Details

Full title:JEFF HARRISON , Plaintiff, v. U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2016

Citations

2:14-cv-1806-LSC (N.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2016)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. N. Am. Indus. Servs.

See also Harrison v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry, 2016 WL 4581091, at *9 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 19, 2016), report and…