Opinion
22-1383
02-21-2023
Patricia Logan Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ashley Limehouse, Jr., William Grayson Lambert, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul Woodington, DAVIDSON, WREN &DEMASTERS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY POPE &LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; James Houston Burns, Matthew Douglas Patterson, Thadeous Herbert Westbrook, III, Columbia, South Carolina, Miles Edward Coleman, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY &SCARBOROUGH LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 7, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00895-JFA)
ON BRIEF:
Patricia Logan Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Ashley Limehouse, Jr., William Grayson Lambert, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul Woodington, DAVIDSON, WREN &DEMASTERS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY POPE &LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; James Houston Burns, Matthew Douglas Patterson, Thadeous Herbert Westbrook, III, Columbia, South Carolina, Miles Edward Coleman, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY &SCARBOROUGH LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Patricia L. Harrison appeals the district court's order sanctioning her pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. We review for abuse of discretion a district court's order granting sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. Morris v. Wachovia Sec., Inc., 448 F.3d 268, 277 (4th Cir. 2006). After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and the district court's thorough order, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Estate of Valentine v. South Carolina, No. 3:18-cv-00895-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2022). We deny Harrison's motions for judicial notice and for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.