Harrison v. State

Full title: MATTHEW BLAKE HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 19, 2021

313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-465

03-19-2021

Matthew Blake HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following revocation of Appellant's probation. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the order revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated Special Condition 13, not Special Condition 12. See Daniels v. State , 200 So. 3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

1

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERROR.

SASSO, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).