From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HARRISON v. KAPP

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1955
85 S.E.2d 337 (N.C. 1955)

Opinion

Filed 14 January, 1955.

Automobiles 8i, 18h (2) — This action was instituted to recover damages resulting from a collision at an intersection of streets in a municipality. Plaintiff's evidence that she entered the intersection first and that defendants entered the intersection from her left, is sufficient to take the case to the jury over defendants' motion to nonsuit. G.S. 20-155.

APPEAL by the plaintiff from Fountain, Special Judge, 19 July, 1954 Term, FORSYTH.

Ingle, Rucker Ingle for plaintiff, appellant.

Deal, Hutchins Minor, by Fred S. Hutchins, for defendants, appellees.


The plaintiff brought this action, alleging she suffered personal injuries and property damage on account of the actionable negligence of the defendants in a collision between her Ford and the Plymouth driven by the defendant Annie B. Kapp. The accident occurred at 11:30 a.m. on a clear day at the intersection of First Street and Cloverdale Avenue in the City of Winston-Salem.

The defendants denied negligence on the part of Annie B. Kapp and set up a counterclaim alleging actionable negligence on the part of the plaintiff and asked for recovery for personal injury and property damage suffered by the defendants.

The plaintiff's evidence disclosed that West First Street runs near east and west and that Cloverdale Avenue runs near north and south. There was an electrically operated traffic control signal light over the center of the intersection. However, at the time of the accident this light was temporarily out of working order. The plaintiff was going west on First Street, the defendants north on Cloverdale. The defendants, therefore, were to plaintiff's left, and the plaintiff was on the defendants' right. Mrs. Motsinger, a plaintiff's witness, testified she saw the accident; that plaintiff entered the intersection first, at about 15 miles per hour; that the defendants did not stop as they approached the intersection, but entered at about 20 or 25 miles per hour. The cars came to rest on the northwest corner of the intersection.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, motion for judgment of nonsuit was made and sustained, and from the judgment dismissing the action the plaintiff excepted and appealed.


The plaintiff's showing that she entered the intersection first, that she was on the right and the defendants on her left, is sufficient to survive the motion for nonsuit and take the case to the jury. G.S. 20-155. As is customary in reversing a nonsuit, we refrain from discussing the evidence, except to the extent necessary to show the reason for the conclusion reached.

Reversed.


Summaries of

HARRISON v. KAPP

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1955
85 S.E.2d 337 (N.C. 1955)
Case details for

HARRISON v. KAPP

Case Details

Full title:NANNIE T. HARRISON v. ANNIE B. KAPP AND THOMAS E. KAPP

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1955

Citations

85 S.E.2d 337 (N.C. 1955)
85 S.E.2d 337

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Camp

The omission to perform a duty cannot constitute one of the proximate causes of an accident unless the doing…

Tucker v. Moorefield

Similarly, when a judgment of nonsuit is reversed, we refrain from stating the evidence. Goldston v. Tool…