From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Herbel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 12, 2008
281 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7748.

Submitted: May 30, 2008.

Decided: June 12, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:05-ct-00550-D).

William Henry Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William Henry Harrison appeals the district court's orders: (1) dismissing this action arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Freedom of Information Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (2000), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and North Carolina state law; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Herbel, No. 5:05-ct-00550-D (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2007; filed Oct. 10, entered Oct. 11, 2007; Nov. 6, 2007; Mar. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Herbel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 12, 2008
281 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Harrison v. Herbel

Case Details

Full title:William Henry HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryon HERBEL, Doctor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

281 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Lutheran Medical Center

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed "for the reasons stated by the district court." Harrison v.…