From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 13, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers within 20 days after service upon plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

It is required that a motion to restore an action struck from any calendar be supported by a proper statement of readiness and by affidavits showing the merits of the action, the reasons for the acts or omissions which caused it to be struck from the calendar, and good cause why it should be restored (22 NYCRR 675.5 [b]). The affidavit of merits must be provided by one with knowledge of the facts ( Rothenberg v Parkway Exterminating Co., 90 A.D.2d 497).

The plaintiff's motion to restore his case to the Trial Calendar was not supported by any of the required showings and therefore should not have been granted. Accordingly, the order restoring the matter to the calendar is reversed and the motion denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers in accordance with subdivision (b) of section 675.5 of the rules of this court. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Harrison v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HARRISON, Respondent, v. WILLIE A. HENDERSON, Defendant, and ST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Giammanco v. City of New York

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied. Under the rules of this…