From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Deboard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
2:12-cv-2000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion


CARL F. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. D. DeBOARD, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2000 KJM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 31, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Defendants' motion for summary judgment in this prisoner excessive force case recently was denied. (ECF No. 97.) Prior to setting pretrial deadlines, the court will explore whether settlement talks would be beneficial.

         During the entire week of June 1, 2015, the Eastern District of California, Fresno and Sacramento Divisions, is hosting Settlement Week, during which judges will conduct settlement conferences. This case has been identified as potentially appropriate for referral to Settlement Week.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The parties shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, inform the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division, in writing, if they believe a settlement conference would be beneficial, at the following address, fax number, or email address:


Summaries of

Harrison v. Deboard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
2:12-cv-2000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Harrison v. Deboard

Case Details

Full title:CARL F. HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. D. DeBOARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

2:12-cv-2000 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)