From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Cragun

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 2, 1931
3 P.2d 1092 (Utah 1931)

Opinion

No. 5099.

Decided October 2, 1931.

PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS. Appeal from order of department of registration revoking license of physician and surgeon must be first taken to district court (Laws 1921, c. 130, § 3, subd. f, as amended by Laws 1923, c. 49, § 1).

Proceedings by E.B. Harrison, as Assistant to the Director of the Department of Registration of the State of Utah, to revoke the license of Wiley M. Cragun to practice medicine and surgery. From an order revoking the license, the defendant attempted to appeal directly to the Supreme Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Joseph Chez, of Ogden, for appellant.

Geo. P. Parker, Atty. Gen., and Byron D. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


On March 6, 1930, S.W. Golding, as director of the department of registration of the state of Utah, made an order revoking the license of Wiley M. Cragun to practice medicine and surgery. The order was made after proceedings were had as provided for by Laws of Utah 1921, chapters 91 and 130, as amended by Laws of Utah 1923, chapters 49 and 58.

Wiley M. Cragun has attempted to appeal directly to this court from the order revoking his license. He claims the right to prosecute an appeal to this court under the provisions of Laws 1921, c. 130, § 3, subd. f, as amended by Laws 1923, c. 49, § 1; which provides "that appeal to the courts may be had" from an order revoking or refusing to renew the license of a physician and surgeon.

In the case of George W. Baker v. Department of Registration, 3 P.2d 1082, just decided by this court, the provision contained in Laws of Utah 1923, chap. 49, granting an appeal to the courts from an order of the department of registration revoking the license of a physician and surgeon was construed. It is there held that the procedure provided for in the act under review is for an appeal from the department of registration to the district court and from the district court to this court.

This case is controlling here and requires a dismissal of the attempted appeal. Such is the order.

STRAUP, FOLLAND, and EPHRAIM HANSON, JJ., concur.

CHERRY, C.J., did not participate herein on account of illness.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Cragun

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 2, 1931
3 P.2d 1092 (Utah 1931)
Case details for

Harrison v. Cragun

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON v. CRAGUN

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Oct 2, 1931

Citations

3 P.2d 1092 (Utah 1931)
3 P.2d 1092

Citing Cases

Withers v. Golding, Director Dept. of Registration

The procedure thus outlined was followed thereafter until 1933. See Moormeister v. Golding, 84 Utah 324, 27…

CRAGUN v. SECOND DISTRICT COURT ET AL

5).Baker v. Department of Registration, 78 Utah 424, 3 P.2d 1082; Harrison v. Cragun, 78 Utah 445, 3 P.2d…