Harrison v. California State Penitentiary Medical Care

Full title: KHALID HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PENITENTIARY MEDICAL CARE…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

2:10-cv-2659 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2011)

Opinion

KHALID HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PENITENTIARY MEDICAL CARE, Defendant. No. 2:10-cv-2659 MCE KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 21, 2011

          FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed March 8, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

         These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).