From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Zook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2020
CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-CV-2113-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-CV-2113-M-BK

08-26-2020

ROBERT LYNN HARRIS, Petitioner, v. K. ZOOK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. Petitioner filed objections, and the Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiff may seek relief under other procedural vehicles.

The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith. --------

If petitioner files a notice of appeal,

( ) petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

(X) petitioner must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
SO ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2020.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Zook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2020
CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-CV-2113-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Harris v. Zook

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LYNN HARRIS, Petitioner, v. K. ZOOK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:20-CV-2113-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)