From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Williams

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 10, 2022
Civil Action 1:19-00297-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:19-00297-KD-MU

01-10-2022

JEFFERY HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

KRISTI K. DuBOSE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated December 9, 2021, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED because the Petitioner has procedurally defaulted any cognizable constitutional claim that he has asserted pursuant to O'Sullivan v. Boerckel. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Harris v. Williams

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 10, 2022
Civil Action 1:19-00297-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:19-00297-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 10, 2022)