Opinion
3:20-cv-557-MMD-CSD
08-07-2023
WILLIAM E. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. H. WICKHAM, et al., Defendants.
Douglas R. Rands, Esq. Nevada Office of Attorney General Attorneys for the Defendants Travis N. Barrick, Esq. Gallian Welker & Associates, L.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
Douglas R. Rands, Esq.
Nevada Office of Attorney General
Attorneys for the Defendants
Travis N. Barrick, Esq.
Gallian Welker & Associates, L.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (SEVENTH REQUEST)
Plaintiff William Harris (“Mr. Harris”), through his attorney of record, Travis N. Barrick, Esq., of the law firm of GALLIAN WELKER & ASSOCIATES, L.C., and the Defendants, through their attorneys of record of the OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, hereby submit their stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff and Defendants to file their respective Responses to the pending Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 90 and 91)
I. STATUS.
On 7/14/23, Mr. Harris filed his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (EFC No. 90). The Defendants' Response became due on 8/4/23.
On 7/17/23, the Defendants filed their Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (EFC No. 91). Mr. Harris' Response became due on 8/7/23.
Counsel for the parties are seeking a 21-day extension of time to file their respective Responses.
The Defendants' Response will become due on 8/25/23.
Mr. Harris' Response will become due on 8/28/23.
II. BASIS FOR EXTENSION.
Counsel for the parties are active litigators in this area of law and have unusual case loads. Counsel for the parties stipulate to the dates set forth above, out of professional courtesy.
Counsel for the parties further stipulate and agree that this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
There shall be no further extensions granted barring unforeseen and extenuating circumstances.
IT IS SO ORDERED.