From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 31, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7750 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7750

01-31-2013

KEITH HARRIS, Petitioner v. M. WENEROWICZ, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Thomas J. Rueter, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as meritless;
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED;
4. Petitioner's request for discovery (Document # 6) is DENIED; and
5. A certificate of appealability is not granted.

This petition is clearly untimely. The petitioner has presented nothing to refute that finding. His claim of extraordinary circumstances preventing him from filing a timely petition provides him no relief. Finally, his allegations do not support a finding that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled. See Holland v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 2554, 2562 (2010).

BY THE COURT:

______________________

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J


Summaries of

Harris v. Wenerowicz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 31, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7750 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Harris v. Wenerowicz

Case Details

Full title:KEITH HARRIS, Petitioner v. M. WENEROWICZ, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7750 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2013)