From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Warden, Folsom State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-1749 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1749 AC P

09-28-2021

EARNEST S. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FOLSOM STATE PRISON, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, while petitioner has submitted a certified trust account statement, he has not filed an in forma pauperis application. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit the appropriate application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Alternatively, petitioner may pay the $5.00 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner may alternatively pay the $5.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. DATED: September 28, 2021


Summaries of

Harris v. Warden, Folsom State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-1749 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Warden, Folsom State Prison

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST S. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FOLSOM STATE PRISON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1749 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)